If you’ve sat through IEP meetings, nodded your way through reports and trusted the process – only to find your child is still struggling – this is for you.

I remember being in my first year of teaching and several things about IEPs didn’t sit well with me. But what did I know? I was 23, overwhelmed with curriculum demands and special needs students and figured I wasn’t qualified to make those judgements.

I am often accused of being against IEPs (and tutoring) – which I adamantly am not. What I am against is their misuse.

I will go as far as saying that the overuse and over-reliance of IEPs when it is not appropriate is not only careless, it is negligent – and in that, it borders on abuse – yes I said it. Abuse. The abuse of a child emotionally and their intellectual potential.

When the school provides IEPs that are not used appropriately or responsibly, it is the child’s self-esteem that suffers. They start to believe they are different, inadequate and limited – and too often every aspect of their being begins to embody that.

It’s not just that they call themselves ‘stupid’, it’s that they believe it. How can they not when they are handed a laptop to read for them with the assumption by the adults in their life that reading and writing well will just never happen for them?

Some of these kids soldier on and make it through sufficiently but far too many embody low self-worth. They no longer put in the effort at school because it feels futile, they may seek acceptance and validation in other ways through their social circle and still others shut down completely – even dropping out.

So, if you find yourself asking the right questions and being told to be patient – listen to your mama’s intuition.

You’re not crazy for wondering why the plan isn’t working.
And you’re not alone in feeling like your child has been failed by a system that promised support but delivered very little transformation.

As a former teacher, I’ve seen it from the inside. As a brain-based educational therapist, what I’m about to share may be difficult to hear but it’s the truth too many families never get.

Let’s start from the beginning.

IEPs Were Meant to Be Temporary

Individual Education Plans (IEPs) were originally created to be short-term solutions while children received the interventions they needed to reach grade level. Of course there are the children who have severe developmental delays that will always need to be accommodated and long term IEPs are appropriate in those instances.

But IEPs are now being used for every learning challenge as a permanent solution. Dyslexia, dysgraphia, learning disabilities and of course ADHD.

The interventions required for children to truly overcome learning challenges with learning and reading as well as attention require money, training and time and most school systems don’t have the resources.

Instead of intensive support, children are handed long-term plans that label and manage them rather than move them forward.

I can’t tell you how many times I had a student come into my class in grade 7 and 8 who received an IEP in grade 2, 3 or 4 and still couldn’t read above grade 4 reading level at best when they were graduating grade 8. Many were still reading at grade 1 reading level.

This is unacceptable, since leading researchers in the field of dyslexia like Yale professor, Dr. Sally Shaywitz states that even those with severe dyslexia can learn to read fluently with the right interventions.

But the right interventions aren’t provided and that becomes a liability for school boards.

IEPs Protect the School More Than the Student

I know. It’s harsh AND it’s true. The IEP is first and foremost a legal document. Its job is to demonstrate that the school is offering support, which protects the school board from legal consequences if your child doesn’t progress like other children.

This is why most government funded schools in Canada and the US aren’t allowed to refer out to external services. They are not allowed to acknowledge that they can’t meet the needs of every learner because they are legally required to (even though every teacher and principal KNOWS they can’t meet the needs of every learner with the resources they have!)

The IEP checks a box. It moves a child to the next grade but it rarely moves the needle in reading, comprehension, processing speed or cognitive growth – all of which can change – with the right brain-based approach.

Most IEP Supports Are Band-Aids

Extra time. Reduced workload. Visual aids. Movement breaks. Assistive technology.

These are helpful for managing daily overwhelm temporarily – but they don’t develop and strengthen the weak systems in the brain that support fluent reading, focus, retention or behavior.

These accommodations should be used to help kids stay afloat while the underlying challenges are being addressed, but that’s rarely the case. Over time, they send a message that the child can’t succeed without lowered expectations which is devastating to their confidence and limiting to their future.

The Bar Gets Lower – and Stays There

For many students, IEPs come with an unintended consequence: the quiet lowering of expectations. Sometimes this is necessary and appropriate but more often, it becomes permanent because the right supports (the ones that actually change the brain) were never offered in the first place. When we stop expecting growth, we stop creating the conditions for it and kids internalize that.

You can’t reach an expectation that was never set.

IEPs Can Quietly Erode Confidence

Kids are not stupid. When they are told they will be supported, yet no one expects them to go further and they see they’re never really getting ahead – it’s devastating to their self-worth.

They absolutely notice when they’re not progressing like their peers and this impacts more than academics – it shapes their identity.

The IEP has nothing to do with a child’s true potential and everything to do with the limited resources and understanding of the people who put them in place. Yet, those lowered expectations become the new normal and that’s when learning struggles become permanent obstacles to navigate and when
opportunity shrinks because no child can grow beyond what the adults around them have stopped expecting from them.

Most IEPs Ignore the Science of Neuroplasticity

The most frustrating part for myself and so many others in the field of educational therapy and neuroplasticity is that both Psych. Ed assessments and IEPs do not reflect what decades of research has revealed about the brain’s ability to change.

Seventy-five years of research shows that intelligence, learning, memory, processing speed and behavior can all be improved through brain-based interventions. Neuroplasticity is real and no one is exempt from it. The brain can change at any age.

Unfortunately, IEPs are built on an outdated model that treats diagnoses as fixed and ignores the role of the nervous system, cognitive development, retained reflexes, brain hemisphere imbalance and yes even nutrition and gut-brain health.
The biggest problem with IEPs is that they don’t address why a child is struggling.

Ignoring the science of neuroplasticity and the evidence-based therapies that are used by leading hospitals and private schools for recovery from everything from brain damage to learning difficulties is not only ineffective, it’s unethical.

The Accommodations Sound Nice – But Don’t Rewire the Brain

There are decades of neuroscience showing that the brain can change: memory, focus, reading, executive function and even IQ. All of it is neuroplastic. The brain can grow new connections with the right kind of input but most IEPs don’t include anything related to brain-based intervention.

The IEP doesn’t strengthen the neural pathways responsible for reading, memory, processing and regulation. They don’t improve cognitive functions or strengthen weak connections. So yes, your child might cope better – but they’re still not learning how to learn better.

There is no mention of primitive reflexes, sensory processing integration, nervous system regulation or optimizing gut-brain health.

The lack of curiosity about why the brain isn’t functioning well is exactly what keeps kids limited. Instead, there is just a list of what to do around the dysfunction. That’s not real support. That’s symptom management.

IEPs Are Written Without the Time, Training or Capacity to Follow Through

Most IEPs are created using templates, dropdowns and pre-written language that sounds individualized but often isn’t. This is not an attack on teachers – they’re doing their best in an impossible system. In fact, I will humbly admit I was guilty of it myself. The ‘copy-and-paste’ that so many teachers do because ultimately they have no idea what to do or how they would do it differently. Teachers and the current classrooms are just not equipped to meet the needs of these unique learners.

In fact, most teachers aren’t trained in how to write or implement effective IEPs. Most teachers I worked with had the best intentions but are drowning in oversized classrooms and impossible demands.

Even if the IEP looks good on paper, most schools and teachers can’t follow it consistently. Services are missed, therapies are canceled and teachers are just trying to hold down the fort. Parents are rarely notified about any of this and no surprise the child continues to fall behind – and they blame themselves.

The IEP Process Gaslights Parents

I’ve seen hundreds of hilarious memes of moms walking into IEP meetings ‘armed up’ and ready. Any parent who has a child with an IEP knows when they are walking into an IEP meeting, they are walking into the arena. They often feel bullied, outnumbered and belittled by the staff.

Parents are told to trust the team and stay hopeful because these things take time. Meanwhile, your child is drowning, hates school and their self-esteem is eroding. You are told to get involved as a parent, but when you do or when you question IEPs or the school, you are often labeled as ‘difficult’, ‘demanding’ or ‘overly anxious’.

It’s isolating and lonely and let’s face it – it leaves you feeling downright despair. Like so many moms out there you begin to doubt yourself – what you did wrong, why does no one understand, why can no one help and even further down your instincts are screaming for something more.

This isn’t advocacy. It’s damage control – and it’s exhausting.

Your Child Is Not Broken – But the System Is

I stand firmly behind the quote, “Never let a broken system convince you that you have a broken child.’

IEPs might help manage day-to-day struggles, but they don’t unlock your child’s potential because they’re not designed to. In case you didn’t get the memo, the IEP system isn’t about transformation. It’s built for containment.

Your Child Is Not Being Fully Supported – They’re Being Managed

The bottom line is IEPs move kids through the system, they keep things organized and meet the school’s legal requirements but they don’t optimise learning ability.

If we want something better for our kids, we have to advocate for more of something different. We need to advocate for brain-based learning therapies that are integrative.

Of course that takes time so I encourage you, for now not to rely on the school system to resolve your child’s learning difficulties and to instead go beyond what the school can offer.

Go beyond tutoring and extra-practice and reading programs.

Let the IEP do what it is meant to do – keep your child afloat while deeper, neuroplastic interventions optimize your child’s ability to learn.

What If We Stopped Managing and Started Rewiring with a Corrective Approach?

If your child is struggling – it doesn’t mean they’re not trying hard enough or they need to do more.

It means they are working too hard to learn because they have weak connections in the area of the brain needed for the processes they’re struggling with.

Tutors or practice can’t resolve those specific problems. Your child needs a combo of brain-based learning interventions and neuro-technologies to strengthen weak and underdeveloped brain levels as well as targeted cognitive therapies to build those individual skills.

It doesn’t mean you haven’t done enough as a parent or that you have failed. It means no one has looked deep enough. This is where I come in.

My program, the Full Potential Academy, is a root-cause, brain-based approach that addresses the underlying weaknesses with an integrative approach.

We target the very systems responsible for learning, behavior and emotional regulation with functional nutrition, brain integration therapies and neuro-technologies that are evidence-based and bio-individual – all the things that the conventional systems overlook.

Instead of doing more of the same, do something different – one that’s based in the science of neuroplasticity.

Let’s Find the Real Reason Behind the Struggle

If your child is still struggling despite tutoring, IEPs and all the ‘right’ supports and your gut is telling you there’s more going on and more you can do to help your child regain their confidence – trust it.

Book a free Clarity Call to uncover what’s actually keeping your child stuck – and how we can finally move your child forward with a plan that works with the brain, not around it.

This call is for you if:

  • You’re done guessing.
  • You want a second opinion from someone who understands the system and the science.
  • You’re ready for answers that go deeper than test scores and labels.

IEPs get your child through the grade, not through the struggle. Let’s go beyond meeting expectations – let’s surpass them.

Book a Clarity Call today.

Darkside Pin

8 Responses

  1. My daughter doesn’t have an IEP but I just git the call FRIDAY that she fits the description for one and her IQ when the times portion of her education is taken OUT how much more better she does. But when it is added in..she fails horribly. So they want me to sign papers for her to start an IEP. But being apart if the education system is know that there’s something MORE they are not saying about the IEP..I feel it’s something they are leaving out. Yes teachers are overworked and under payed..but I don’t want my child stuck with a STAIN on her educational record that WE could work hard at getting work done and trying our best as opposed to sticking her jn a classroom full of bad behavior as a result of lack of learning disabilities..I feel like together we can bring her grades,speed, and confidence up here at home or even with sum extra after school time. And yes I do feel her brain is wired differently. I have 2other girls and no one moves as slow as my middle child.

    1. Realmente esta situación es muy confusa hablan del IEP pero en mi situación personal tuve que sacar a mi hijo de las terapias del habla en 3 GRADO porque no veía que avanzara en su informe anual empecé a investigar que hacía mi hijo en su 30 mits 2 veces por semana entonces le hacían una copia del cualquier dibujo q el quería y lo habían colorear la maestra les leía libro para todo el grupo entonces en realidad no había mucha práctica del habla no interactúaba pero mientras tanto mi hijo hiba bajando su puntaje en la materia que justamente le sacaban a terapia porque se perdía su clase y cuando regresaba no sabía que explicó la maestra luego tampoco podía resolver la tarea asignada porque perdió su clase por ir a terapia el se sentía frustrado porque estaba perdiendo clase y sentía que no estaba aprendiendo al principio no le tome importancia pero luego mi hijo decía que los exámenes no podía resolver habían preguntas que eso no lo vio en clase entonces entendí que en vez de hacerle un bien a él lo estaban haciendo un mal estaba perdiendo sus clases . Decidí sacarlo de las terapias de la escuela claro la escuela no le gustó la idea porque les dije que yo le mandaria a terapia sin problema pero fuera de las horas de clase además dije que el estába ya con una maestra después de clase claro yo pagaba eso pero conseguí terapia del habla y por suerte le cubría el seguro. A todo esto creo de momento tome la mejor decisión mi hijo avanzado mucho con las terapias afuera y la maestra una vez a la semana.El dio un cambio y un avance total ,en la escuela me lo estaban atrasado más que ayudando,ese es mi punto de vista pero todos tenemos historias diferentes y respecto a cada uno es solo un poco de mi historia con mi hijo

  2. As a parent it is your responsibility to speak up for your child and do your research, talk to your child’s doctors and ask them what they think will help your child succeed. My twins require an iep or 504 and anyone who want to label them can kick rocks I also don’t care if anyone, teachers, counselors or doctors thinks I’m difficult because I’m doing what’s best for my children, that’s my job!! I don’t particularly care for the word disabled because they are not disabled they are difabled(different abilities) if your child needs help or accommodations then you should not feel like you’re being difficult. There are many different types of abilities. Also some hospitals have programs to help you find the best ways to help your child.

  3. As a student with ADHD in PCHS highschool “Present” I feel like maybe we are not supportive enough to start protests to stand up for our kids with disabilities that feel pressured whenever they get asked to do something? I had to use the Anonymous report system to report a teacher at my school who is purposely stalking us student because We can’t be believed because of our rights of students with disabilities we feel like the alternative programs are trying to instead of supporting us we have IEPS but the IEPS are often used against us as students. Supporting the idea that we can’t Think for ourselves or that we are too dumb to think ourselves. There are some alternatives to this for us students though we can Protest by wearing specific clothing at school but we feel that in a way we are restricted from being able to protest if we could or wanted to. WE ARE NOT ROBOT STUDENTS DO NOT TREAT US LIKE WE DISABILITY STUDENTS ARE ROBOTS WE CAN THINK FOR OURSELVES WE DO NOT NEED TO HAVE THE THOUGHT OF OUR “IEP GOALS” MANAGE OUR FREEDOM EVEN IF IT IS THE LAW.

  4. I am raising two granddaughters and a great grandson. They have IEP‘s ones in 11th grade and 12th grade they have a second third grade math and reading level. They have not learned anything in the school system in the past 12 and 13 years. They cannot bring their laptops home. Their e-learning day was to trace a stocking… Color a snowman and their 11th 12th grade really my great grandson is in fourth grade, but they want to keep him in second grade because they don’t have teachers for fourth and fifth grade. These school systems are a joke. They’re not teaching our kids anything. I’m ready to sue the school Systems.

  5. Need an Attorney to sue the school systems. They are not teaching our kids anything shoving them along. I couldn’t even get my grandson and a private school because he has IEP he is in fourth grade, but they want to keep him in second grade because I don’t have a teacher for fourth and fifth grade need to sue the school systems

  6. I absolutely agree with this. IEP’s are good in theory, but the way they’re implemented just sucks. I had an IEP back when I was in elementary, middle, and early high school and it’s honestly been more of a burden than it was helping me. Throughout my IEP, people talked as if I was capable but implied incapability through their actions. For instance, they forced me to take small group testing when I could’ve done in person and handled it perfectly well. Furthermore, they made me do IEP meetings(I was diagnosed with autism) where they would show me pictures of people and asked me to identify the emotion, and that honestly felt so humiliating because most of the time, it was obvious and I didn’t need to know how to identify it. And when I told them that, they ignored me and continued to force me to go through this humiliating and degrading ritual. On a side note, the same thing happened when my parents put me and kept me in ABA therapy against my will. They showed those same stupid pictures asking me to identify the emotion, and they also made me do countless other stupid things as well, like following directions: Things I absolutely knew how to do. Upon asking them why I was forced to do it unlike the other kids, they deflected my questions, implying that I was a broken, incapable person when that was never the case. When I went from 5th grade to 6th grade, I wanted to take advanced classes but my teacher decided to keep me in all regular classes except math because apparently, she “didn’t know if I would get IEP accommodations in advanced classes,” even when I had the grades and the performance to back it up. This forced me to have to forgo many electives in middle to take on more advanced classes, and even then, my IEP kept implying that I couldn’t handle it. Thankfully, they couldn’t force me to take regular classes, which was a lifesaver. However, time and time again, I proved that I could handle it. Even in high school, every time I decided to take more and more AP classes, and getting all A’s the IEP people kept implying that I wouldn’t be able to handle the next year’s workload, where I planned to take more AP’s. Even when time, and time again I proved them wrong, they still kept pushing that BS about how I “wouldn’t be able to handle it.” The IEP system is deeply flawed, forcing kids to take “help” even when they don’t need it and say they don’t need it, forcing them to go through humiliating rituals such as identifying some emotion, and trying to hold them back from challenging themselves academically while keeping them at mediocrity. The IEP system should encourage students to take MORE AP’s, MORE advanced classes, and to get the highest SAT scores possible. Not to keep them mediocre for the rest of their academic careers, and unless it does that, countless kids with the potential to achieve great things will remain at the same level their entire lives, not because they didn’t want to improve, but because this system and the “diagnosis” they got didn’t allow them to.

  7. My 39 months old daughter recommended to find to go through IEP because she was intangible out of unfamiliar context. We went to Childs finds, send them the videos they requested. They scheduled a 30 mins meeting to go over it and rushed through the meeting in under 10 mins. Looking at the invite i was suspicious of it been a onboarding exercise rather than solving our concern. During the meeting I have to raise my hand to ask a certain questions. Her form said she had tongue tie and they did not address this. When asked they replied it could be and we would assess in person. But even before than from the conversation it felt they already made up their mind to enroll her. They did in person assessment and sent the report and scheduled another call for under 10 mins today. Rushed again. Her education assessment was at age level and even 99 percentile. However they said articulation is something to be worked on. For articulation assessment they said it was an informal assessment. My wife asked why informal. they had the person was observing etc. I didn’t buy it or don’t understand what they saying. Here is a snippet from her articulation assessment below. I think they are just trying to enroll her in the program. Most of the time my daughter is tangible and in context even the teacher said is not a problem.

    Jane’s performance on the Sounds in Words Test of the GFTA-3 indicated a delay in her articulation skills, as compared to other girls her
    chronological age. Jane’s errors consisted mainly of substitutions and deletions of both earlier and later developing sounds. Vocalic /r/
    distortion was also noted. Errors were noted in production of the /n/, /f/, /v/, /k/, /g/, /s/, /z/, /r/, /?/, /t?/, /?/, /O/, /ð/, and ng sounds. Jane
    engaged in a mixture of the phonological patterns of fronting, in which she substituted a consonant produced in the front of her mouth (i.e., /t/,
    3/11/26, 10:19 AM Case Management – Printout

    https://iep.online-iep.com/maryland/Form/Print.aspx?u=KO4iPh%2bxdYs%2fcPPTvhBViMTaXvexv%2b2BIh61U%2fidqnw7YNjHnXD1Uh%2bjKk9MQ4… 3/6

    /d/) for a consonant produced in the back of her mouth (i.e., /k/, /g/), and backing, in which she substituted a consonant produced in the back of
    her mouth (i.e., /k/, /g/) for a consonant produced in the front of her mouth (i.e., /s/, /ð/). She also engaged in the phonological pattern of
    stopping, in which she substituted a stop consonant (i.e. /p/, /b/, /t/, /d/) for a fricative (i.e., /f/, /v/, /s/, /z/, /?/, /O/, /ð/) or affricate (i.e., /t?/, /?/)
    consonant sound. The majority of Jane’s error sounds were stimulable for correct production. Her connected speech was frequently
    unintelligible in unfamiliar contexts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.